It is used to construct portfolios, measure the performance of investment managers,
develop project screening rates for capital budgeting, and value companies. An essential
prerequisite for using beta for decision making is a reasonable degree of stationarity and
predictability overtime. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of market
phases on the stationarity of beta in the Indian stock market from 1991 to 2002.
This study briefly reviews the relevant literature and presents evidences, which show that
the effect of alternating bull and bear market phases on beta is not consistent and
significant, and therefore beta cannot be put to practical use.
Beta
Stocks are subject to systematic risks, which are common to all, and unsystematic risks
which are industry- or firm-specific. Systematic risk includes economic and political
conditions, which are expected to affect all stocks in a similar fashion, though the extent
may differ. Unsystematic risk includes factors such as government policies regarding
a particular industry, labor availability, the financial structure of a firm, etc. Unsystematic
risk is considered as diversifiable through the creation of portfolios. According to Gooding and O’Malley (1977), stationarity refers to the absence of period
to period fluctuation in beta, while stability is concerned with fluctuations in beta caused
by varying the differencing intervals (weeks, months) in calculating returns.
Research on
stationarity of beta has covered various aspects. Blume (1971) studied stationarity using
beta sorted portfolios; he found correlation between periods increased with the size of
portfolios. Baesel (1974) studied the risk class changes using a simple transition matrix
and found that the stationarity increases with increase in period length. Vasicek (1973)
suggested a Bayesian approach to the adjustment of security and portfolio betas.
Blume (1975) examined in detail the tendencies of betas to regress towards the mean over
time. Scholes and Williams (1977) highlighted the problem of non-synchronous trading
for calculation of beta. Fabozzi and Francis (1977) investigated the effect of bull and bear
markets on alpha and beta. A modified version of the single index market model was
tested using alternative definitions of bull and bear market conditions on monthly returns
of 700 stocks on the NYSE from 1966 to 1971. They found no significant effect of the
alternating forces of bull and bear markets. Gooding and O’Malley (1977) studied monthly
returns for portfolios created from 200 of the largest US stocks from November 1966 to
1974 and used correlation analysis and paired t-tests to check the stationarity of beta.
They found that beta coefficients were influenced by major market trends. |