Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance
Board Composition and Performance in Indian Firms: A Comparison
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The paper attempts to understand the relationship between board composition and performance in Indian firms. Here, Indian firms have been classified into four groups—Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), stand-alone firms, private business group affiliated firms, and subsidiaries of foreign firms. The paper analyzes the relationship between the study and independent variables, using a multiple regression model. Results indicate that the larger boards are less effective in Indian firms, except in the case of PSUs. Board size is becoming an insignificant variable in determining the performance of Indian PSUs. Surprisingly, board independence is insignificant across all categories in India, as per the results of this study, which calls for detailed studies in this area.

 
 
 

Fama and Jensen (1983) defined residual claimants as the ones who bear residual risk, i.e., the difference between stochastic inflows of resources and promised payment to agents. When the managers, who take decisions, are not the major residual claimants, and hence do not bear a major share of the financial effects of their decisions, agency problems arise.

To address agency problems, internal, as well as external, corporate governance mechanisms have been put into place, like the board of directors, proxy fights, large shareholders, hostile takeovers and financial structure (Hart, 1995). The most important internal corporate governance mechanism is the board of directors (Subramanian and Swaminathan, 2008). The role of the board is not simply to fulfill its legal requirements. The board of directors of a company provides strategic guidance and leadership; objective judgment, independent of management, to the company; and exercises control over the company, while at all times remaining accountable to the shareholders. An effective corporate governance system is one which allows the board to perform these dual functions efficiently. However, shareholders do not escape agency problems by leaving them to the board of directors, since the directors are themselves agents, whose interests are not necessarily aligned with the shareholders (Hermalin and Weishbach, 1991). Although allowing management to choose their own overseers might lead to agency problems related to independent directors, nonetheless, there are many good reasons to believe that outside directors will exhibit some checks on the top management.

 
 
 

Corporate Governance Journal, Public Sector Undertakings, PSUs, Internal Governance Mechanisms, Corporate Governance, Blue Ribbon Committee, Research and Development/Sales, RDS, Advertisement and Marketing expenses/Sales, ADS, Return on Equity, ROE, Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI, Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee, Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, CMIE, Bombay Stock Exchange, BSE.