Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Amicus Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Cyber Law :
State Cyberspace Jurisdiction and Personal Cyberspace Jurisdiction in Cyber Crimes and Cyber Torts
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A cyber crime or cyber tort may come within the cyberspace territorial jurisdiction of many states, as it may involve multiple victims living in the real world. This article studies the novel concept of correlating traditional jurisdiction aspects with cyberspace jurisdiction for the purpose of trying cyber offences. The determining principles and factors that justify the exercise of jurisdiction by a State for a cyber crime have been identified in the paper. The author strongly feels that conventional notions of the jurisdiction can well be applied to the new cyber-environment by correlating both the State cyberspace jurisdiction and personal cyberspace jurisdiction because, though the forum is new, the parties still exist in physical space and are not electronic personas.

Cyberspace is a global network and it has become a medium not only for entertainment, but also an important source of information and news distribution. Cyberspace is an endless network and electronic territory, connecting computers and other electronic devices located in many countries/states or satellites or even out of earth and in a different planet or galaxy, if there is a possibility for wireless electronic connection and communication which probably will be achieved in the future. Cyberspace's architecture and structure facilitate freedom of expression. The increasing pervasiveness of the cyberspace it creates, along with its transformative impacts (global reach), create a range of entirely new challenges for police questioning their traditional local dominance over the security domain, and could, in fact, marginalize them entirely. The concept of cyber-crime not only produces problems for the police-because cyberspace-related offences take place within a worldwide context, whereas crime tends to be nationally defined-but policing cyberspace is also a complex affair by the nature of policing and security being networked.

Cyberspace and related technologies have eroded the capacity of society to enforce criminal laws since they apply to attacks on communications between computers, on data stored in computers and on real world systems controlled by computers or other electronic devices. Cyber crime refers to crimes committed by use of computer technology, either alone or in conjunction with real-world acts. Crime control requires some system to be in place which ensures that rule violators are identified, apprehended and sanctioned. A criminal using technology can commit thousands of crimes fast and with little effort. Since much of the conduct involved in committing the crime occurs in an electronic environment, the "physical" evidence, if any, is evanescent and volatile; and cybercriminals, unlike their real-world counterparts, can enjoy ideal anonymity.

 
 
 

State Cyberspace Jurisdiction and Personal Cyberspace Jurisdiction in Cyber Crimes and Cyber Torts, A cyber crime, cyber tort, cyberspace territorial jurisdiction, involve multiple victims, real world,correlating traditional jurisdiction aspects, cyber offences, determining principles, factors that justify, exercise of jurisdiction, conventional notions.