Vampires have come a long way since the blood-sucking days of Count
Dracula. They have moved out of Transylvania. The soulless creatures
can be fixed with a soul and be made good like Angel in Buffy the Vampire
Slayer (1997). And the sixteen-year-old vampire slayer, Buffy Summers falls for
this mysterious stranger who later turns evil. Louis’ conscience in Interview
with the Vampire—the book by Rice (1976) which was made into a movie starring
Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise—makes him survive on rat blood. He does not fear
the cross and cannot be killed by running a blade through his heart.
In Trueblood (2008), vampires are the hunters as well as the hunted.
With Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight, they became resistant to sunlight and started falling for the young girls they were supposed to dine on. From Bram Stoker to Meyer, what has not changed is the people’s fascination for these undead
creatures of the night.
Vampire tales on print and TV have a huge fan following; they seem to exert
their charm not just on their ill-fated preys. These tales have undergone much
tweaking and revival since Buffy. Yet, the tales of these blood-hungry creatures,
roaming sleepless on moony nights, gorging on young women were too
frightening to fit a family audience. The books catered to a grownup demographic
and the TV shows ran late night. Then suddenly vampires ceased to be the
scary blood-sucking creatures, but pale gorgeous young women and men that
every teen dreamed of.
Meyer, with her Twilight (2005), found a new demographic of vampire fans:
the teens and readers of candyfloss romances. Her books became phenomenal
successes and receptacles of much criticism. How and why that happened are
not questions with easy answers. A close reading of Twilight, a vampire
teen-romance at the superficial level, reveals embedded texts of racism, religion,
and sexist politics. Their masked presence and how they work within and outside
the text form the crux of this paper. |