The "postcolonial relevance" of Postcolonialism, in its ideology and methodology, to India is argued in the paper with reference to Arundhati Roy's `critically' much damaged novel, The God of Small Things. Postcolonialists, after successfully deconstructing the Western constructions of India, should now dismantle India's constructions of itselfits past Varnashramite stratification of Indian humanity. Arundhati Roy's novel has this indigenous postcolonial project at its heart. Her temporal-spatial dramatization of the cause and consequence of the bio-ideological mix of the `untouchable' Velutha and the `touchable' Ammu in the novel, is seen against this backdrop of the remote Indian Hindu history rather than its immediate Syrian Christian/Marxian background with a view to neutralizing the hysterical `erotic' cat calls against it.
Postcolonialism,
in spite of its ideological make-up, remains a methodological
weapon in dismantling the western binary constructions
of the east/orient. Using `race' as a category of analysis,
it has exposed the arbitrary priority given to one race
over the other, locating the dormitory of Imperialism
in none other than the human mind, divided into western
and eastern hemispheres. What underlies the aggression
of one country over the other in multiple manifestationscommercial,
political, religious etc.,is fear. It entails the dialectics
of the power's fear of the powerless and the powerless's
fear of the power. Fear underlines and undermines the
politics of power and the power of politics in global
relationships. Postcolonialism has unearthed the western
fear of the east to prove its constructions as its defense
mechanism against the power of the `powerless east'.
It is here its postmodern methodology blurs with its
postcolonial ideology. After freeing the east from the
prison-house of the western constructions, what is left
to postcolonialists is a blind alley. To escape from
this, they should endeavor to free the east from the
clutches of its own constructions, thereby intensifying
their ideological and social responsibility.
The postcolonial exposure of the Western constructions
of the Orient has, no doubt, its cultural/civilizational
remedies, but the side effects it has created have gone
either unnoticed or ignored. For, it has excited rather
than caused the Eastern spondylitic-complacency that
the East has already constructed itself better/truer
than the West. The first generation postcolonialists
have stopped with their project of decentring the Eurocentric
relational, but not relative, merits of the East, read,
here afterwards, India. It is here that postcolonialism
serves as an extension counter of postmodernism, which,
while puncturing the Western constructions of itself
left the Western constructions of the East untouched.
The Third World Academicians surviving in the First
World academies have got hold of such a construction
and are christening themselves as postcolonialists.
|