After more than five decades of relentless fight against inflation, central bankers world over face a new enemy, deflation. The prospects of a fall in price levels threatens to push the already weak economies further down and make the likelihood of a recovery bleak. The bitter experience of Japan, only adds to the ever-increasing anxiety. The Fed and ECB have taken a public stance to use every weapon in their arsenal to avoid deflation. For many economies across the world, deflation is the new Damocles' Sword.
The
talk of deflation is just about everywhere. The IMF,
the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, all
of them either explicitly or in subtler terms have indicated
that their one big worry today is the threat of deflation.
The IMF has published a detailed report assessing the
38 largest developed and emerging economies on various
parameters. Based on its studies and research the report
categorically divided countries into those that face
high, moderate or low risk of deflation. For its part
the Federal Reserve (Fed), decided to sit tight on the
federal funds rate of 1.25% in its recent Open Market
Committee meeting. Its assessment said, "The probability
of an unwelcome substantial fall in inflation, though
minor, exceeds that of a pick-up in inflation from its
already low level." But the most telling reaction
came from the European Central Bank (ECB). It did two
thingschanged its inflation target from `less than 2%'
to `less than but close to 2%'; and cut down interest
rates from 2.5 to 2%.
Deflation,
defined as the fall in the general price level, could
be a boon or a bane depending on why it occurs. A fall
in price level could occur for two fundamental reasons,
an increase in supply or a fall in demand. An increase
in supply creates a supply side deflation, which is
also called as benign deflation or good deflation. This
kind of a fall in prices is essentially caused by technology
improvements, efficiency gains, cost-cutting measures
etc., that enhance the supply of goods while keeping
costs down. This reducing cost of manufacturing gives
the producer a chance to supply goods at lower prices.
If a producer so chooses, he can retain the profits
but competitive pressures and the run for higher market
share ensure that some of the gains are passed on to
consumers. |