| In his first press conference after his re-election as the Prime 
                  Minister on board Air India One, Manmohan Singh 
                  revealed that "when he (L K Advani) rang up on May 16 to 
                  congratulate on the election results, he expressed regret. I 
                  also conveyed my apologies if I had hurt him." He also said that 
                  he is now looking forward to `close' relations with Advani as 
                  the Leader of Opposition.  This is certainly a sea change in Indian political 
                      arenait brings the much-needed freshness in the conduct of national 
                      political parties. Both the leaders must be congratulated for 
                      their maturity in ushering in a new trend in Indian politicsa trend 
                      of candid admission of transgression from the acceptable levels 
                      of civil behavior committed by the prime ministerial 
                      candidates during electioneering, which, of course, might have been a 
                      requirement of the campaigning for winning the elections. It is a 
                      good beginning. And, it should not end with it. It will augur well for 
                      the nation, if only both of them carry forward 
                      this new-found culture to address the challenges that the nation is today seized with. 
                     To better appreciate the significance of this change in the disposition of leaders 
                        representing the treasury and opposition in the new Parliament towards each other, let 
                        us take a peep into our political history. It has become a custom, perhaps, more by way 
                        of habit, for an opposition leader and his party in the Parliament to oppose each and 
                        every proposition made by the ruling party in its attempt to address a national challenge, 
                        irrespective of its merit or otherwise. Such behavior of the 
                        opposition parties in and out of the Parliament appeared 
                        as though mandatory. No matter, even if they were to 
                        introduce such a bill in the Parliament had they been sitting in the 
                        treasury benches, oppose they must, and that is what we 
                        have been by and large witnessing in our Parliament, ever since 
                        we had one of our own.
                   |