| |
|
The IUP Journal of Structural Engineering
:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Abstract |
 |
|
In India, Unreinforced Masonry (URM) infills are invariably used in frame
buildings for their low cost, ease in construction, and good sound and heat insulation
properties. However, safety of these infills during earthquake is a major issue, particularly
in important buildings like hospitals. Infills are subjected to in-plane forces due to
inter-storey drift and out-of-plane forces due to floor acceleration. Base isolation is a
very promising technique, which controls the inter-storey drift and floor
accelerations, simultaneously. The present study explores the efficacy of base isolation for
achieving the desired seismic performance of URM infills. A procedure is presented for
the design of base isolation systems for URM infilled frame buildings. The efficacy
of base isolation is studied for two URM infilled RC (Reinforced Concrete) frame
hospital buildings, four and eight-storeys tall. The effect of isolators on dynamic
characteristics, seismic performance, inter-storey drift ratio and peak floor acceleration is
presented. It is found that it is possible to design a viable isolation system to achieve
immediate occupancy performance level of URM infills in the four-storey building;
however, only life safety performance level could be achieved for the eight-storey building. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
 |
Description |
 |
Unreinforced Masonry (URM) infilled RC (Reinforced Concrete) frames are the
most common structures for multistorey buildings in India. Masonry infill is used
in buildings for its good sound and heat insulation properties, low cost and ease
in construction. During earthquakes, the infills are subjected to both in-plane as
well as out-of-plane forces, and their behavior is quite complex. As reported by
Pauley and Priestley (1992), generally, the infills first crack under in-plane forces and
then collapse due to out-of-plane inertia forces. It has been observed that even in
the buildings for which the frame is intact after earthquake, damage of infill is
almost unavoidable. This is not at all acceptable for hospital buildings, which are of utmost
post-earthquake importance and must remain functional after the earthquake.
Other nonstructural components, such as medical equipment and complex network
of electrical and mechanical facilities also must be intact and operational after
the earthquake. Floor response and inter-storey drift, together are responsible for
damage to the nonstructural components, building contents and services. For
hospital buildings, inter-storey drift ratio for infill should be below 0.1% for
Immediate Occupancy (IO) level, and floor accelerations should be such that infills do not
fail in out-of-plane action. The only practical way of reducing floor accelerations
and inter-storey drift simultaneously is to use base isolation.
Kelly and Tsai (1989) conducted a shake-table test to evaluate the seismic
response of a base isolated building and its effect on the primary and secondary
components. This experimental study shows that the first base isolated mode not only
controls the response of the superstructure, but also dominates the response of high
frequency attachments. The contribution of the higher modes to the response of base
isolated structures is very small.
Dolce et al. (2007) performed shake-table tests on URM infilled RC frame
scaled models. The results of the experimental tests show that base isolation can
provide outstanding structural performances, with no damage to the infill walls, even
under strong earthquakes. Moreover, it was concluded from their study that seismic
isolation could also lead to significant improvement in the protection of building contents,
if a proper choice of the isolation system is made, depending on the
dynamic characteristics of the content. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
 |
Keywords |
 |
|
Structural Engineering Journal, Seismic Safety, RC Frame Buildings, Base Isolation, Isolation Systems, Performance-Based Design, Pushover Analysis, Unreinforced Masonry, Heat Insulation, Out-Of-Plane Inertia Forces, Inter-Storey Drift Ratio, Lead-Rubber Bearings, LRB, Friction Pendulum System, FPS, RC Frame
Scaled Models. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |