For many years, distribution systems have been designed to deliver electrical energy
to consumers without any generation of these systems. The demand of the consumers
was being fulfilled with the help of distribution substations. However, due to major changes
in the legislative framework of the electric sector and the move towards liberalization of
the electricity markets, generating units were introduced in the distribution systems.
These units are of limited size (100 MVA or less) and are connected directly to the
distribution network or the consumer sites. These units are usually customer owned and
controlled, and are referred as Distribution Generators (DGs). The main reasons behind the
expected widespread use of DG sets are: (1) Deregulation in the power market, which
encourages public investment to sustain the development in power demand; (2) Emergence of
new generation techniques with small rating, ecological benefits and increased
profitability; and (3) Limitations of existing networks/sources with the continuous growth of
load (Ackerman et al., 2001; and Hegazy et
al., 2003).
The advantages associated with
inclusion of DG sets are: (1) Improvement in voltage profile; (2) Reduction in power loss;
(3) Release of system capacity; and (4) Improvement in composite system reliability.
Further, there are associated problems with such composite distribution systems, e.g.,
operation and control of the different types of DG sets. Many researchers have attempted
the issue of generating capacity reliability evaluation but very limited efforts have
been made in reliability evaluation of capacity of a composite distribution system
(Billinton and Allan, 1998; Kim and Singh, 1998; Rias et al., 1998; and Allan and Billinton,
2000).
This paper addresses the problem of capacity reliability evaluation of a
composite distribution system with customer-owned DG sets when the location of DG sets is
known to the utility. Further, in this paper limitations of the distribution network have not
been considered. Monte Carlo simulation along with extreme distributions for load and
capacity have been considered so as to obtain the
worst case reliability evaluation. |