Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Amicus Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The Analyst Magazine:
Straight Through Processing: Myths and Reality
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Straight Through Processing (STP) is not just an operational initiative. As a strategic imperative any STP program should look beyond a one-time operational plan with a limited objective of achieving a reduced settlement cycle.

Straight Through Processing, the seamless integration of systems and processes spanning the entire securities trade life cycle, has several strategic imperatives. This means that one should not look at STP initiative as a one-time operational plan, which has the limited objective of achieving a reduced settlement cycle. The general tendency is to measure the success of STP initiatives, undertaken by an industry participant, in terms of cost savings or minimization of failed trades. But the real measure is its impact on the competitive position of the participant. This could be in terms of the ability to rapidly introduce new products, improve customer service levels, reduce market and operational risk, or handle large volumes due to new products or asset growth.

The biggest challenge in STP is to determine the best approach to adopt. This is due to certain key factors—the two elements of STP strategy: Internal STP and external STP. Internal STP relates to the trade and settlement processes that are internal to an industry participant. For example, in the case of an investment manager, this includes authorization of orders, placement of orders with brokers, receiving details of executions, allocation process and so on.

 
 
 

Straight Through Processing (STP),operational initiative, strategic imperative,processes spanning, securities trade, strategic imperatives, operational plan, improve customer service levels, reduce market ,operational risk, asset growth,Internal STP,external STP, executions, allocation process .