|
Short-term market players need to analyze the risk involved
in trading by using appropriate methods. Value-at-Risk (VaR)
is one of the most popular risk quantification frameworks
generally followed by banks and other financial institutions
for maintaining capital adequacy norms imposed by the regulators
as recommended by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
(1988, 1996 and 2006). The NSE recommended a technique for
VaR estimation, as developed in Varma (1999) based on EWMA
technique. This method is easy to implement using software
application, either real time or off-line, for modulating
fund management strategies of investors. There are many
methods available in the literature, such as Historical
Simulation (Non-Parametric), Monte Carlo Simulation (Non-Parametric),
Filtered Historical Simulation (Non-Parametric), Variance
Covariance Method (Parametric), Ordinary Least Square (OLS)
Method (Parametric), Kalman Filter Technique (Parametric),
for the purpose of estimating VaR (Shah and Moonis, 2003;
and Lehikoinen, 2007). The VaR framework also dictates application
of backtesting (Campbell, 2005) for checking the reliability,
goodness, and consistency of the VaR model adopted for risk
measurement for the institutions or market.
In the past two years, capital market in India experienced
a state of boom and some indices in different markets in
India doubled their values during this short period. Such
indices may be considered as `virtual portfolio' for testing
VaR estimation framework. Investors often understand market
movement through the variations of different indices designed
by bourses for different specific sector of the market as
well as for general market. Backtesting the applied VaR
estimates can show the reliability of specific estimation
techniques. Verifying the prediction capability can be an
interesting topic for investigation under a particular model.
|