Indian election scenario has seen three phases. The first phase was post-
independence period from 1947-1977 when Indian Congress party was the
only prominent national party. There were other parties who were
locally dominant. But at national level, Congress was expected to win hands down
with no major political, social and economic issues having any impact on election results.
The immediate post-emergency era saw the emergence of Jana Sangh as
the alternative political force. The BJP of today is a broken fraction of it. The
economic and political issues started playing more prominent role in deciding election
result. Since the 1990s, after the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, which was believed
to have weakened the Congress party to certain extent, different national
political parties started forming alliances before and after elections. Predicting the
factors determining the election results have become much more complex.
Since independence, only one thing has been common to all Lok Sabha and
State Legislative Assembly Elections, INC has been the contesting party in
all elections. So, complete analysis of election results for INC has been possible.
Predicting the election results in India is much more complex than
other democratic countries due to mere size and diversity. In the USA, for
example, study of behaviour of stock market is good enough predicting factor
for determining almost accurately the election result. In India, there is no single
factor which is actually a good indicator of the election result. The 2004 general
election was a real eye-opener. The BJP led NDA government was riding on its slogan
of `India shinning'. All predictive models and all opinion polls were indicating
a landslide victory for NDA. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate was
high. There was no major communal/caste issues on air. But the political analysts fail
to see that more than 80% of our voters live in rural areas. They are not much
aware of the growth of GDP or development in the IT sector. To them what matters
is the day-to-day survival. Many states were starving due to droughts. Many
peasants in the remote villages of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka had committed
suicides. The wealth generated by the boom of the IT sector on the two states had
not percolated to the remote villages. Moreover, the Supreme Court, for the
first time, had made it compulsory for all the candidates to reveal their
personal, educational, financial, legal and political details. Nagadevara
(2005) had used classification model and neural network model to study the impact of
candidates' personal background in determining the election result of Karnataka
State Legislature. The prediction model was found to be accurate to a level of 98%. |