During recent years, the age determination of animals in ecological, demographical
and gerontological studies has been realized as a basic necessity. Bone is a dynamic tissue
which exhibits conspicuous `growth marks' and is generally thought to indicate successive bursts
of growth. The growth marks obviously offer an opportunity to assess an animal's
age. Skeletochronological method aims to study the age of amphibians, the relationship
between age and body growth and longevity.
In species capable of breeding in captivity, the young can be reared under standard
laboratory conditions and their age determined by keeping the birth record. But for others which
breed favorably in a natural habitat, suitable alternative methods are required to evaluate the
age. A few researchers have used morphological features to determine the age of amphibians
(Senning, 1940; and Organ, 1961). Although these have been successfully employed
for indirect measures of chronological age, the reliability is often subject to criticism. But the
use of bone histology based on `Skeletochronological' techniques dealing with hard tissues
of vertebrates in general (Castanet, 1978) has been recognized as the most meaningful
and practicable method not only to assess the individual's age but also the speed of growth, age
at sexual maturity and the longevity of various species. In most ectotherms, the occurrence
of bands in cortical bone in successive layers of long bones indicates slow and fast growth
during colder and warmer seasons respectively. Such cyclical growth marks, considered to be
the expression of annual growth periodicity, offer an opportunity to assess the individual's
age. The actual age can be determined by counting the annual rings in the cross sections
of diaphyses of long bones (humerus and femur) and phalanges of amphibians (Cherry
and Francillon-Vieillot, 1992; Kulkarni and Pancharatna, 1996; Sagor et al., 1998; Andia and Behera, 2005; Andia et al., 2009; and Andia et al., 2010). It is analogous to the method used
for age determination in fish by counting growth rings in the scales, bones and
otoliths (Chugunova, 1959) in reptiles (Smirina, 1974; Castanet, 1978; Patnaik and Behera,
1981; Mohapatra et al., 1989; and Waye and Gregory-Patrick, 1998) and in mammals by layers
in bone and tooth tissue (Klevezal, 1988). |