Use of only information and control systems along with pre-defined
goals, objectives and best practices may not necessarily achieve long-term
organizational competence. The new world of business is characterized by
high levels of uncertainty and inability to predict the future. Hence, data, information
and knowledge are valuable in realizing efficient and effective performance outcomes that
any organization or an individual expects. But radical changes in the business
environment have been creating limitations for the traditional information processing view of
Knowledge Management (KM). In the paper titled, "Competitive Knowledge and Strategy in
High Velocity Environments", Chris Hall and Derek Lundberg report that while there is
a correlation between the velocity of the organizational environment and managers'
needs for better competitive knowledge, there is almost no relation between the rate of
change faced by a firm and its competitive knowledge capability. This means higher needs of
manager do not translate into higher intelligence and knowledge capacity. The paper gives a
strong hint to the organizations to have strategic planning in order to survive in the
dynamic environment by meeting competitive knowledge needs. Whereas in the paper,
"Knowledge Sharing and Trust in Organizations", Joanne McNeish and Inder Jit Singh Mann
explored the role of trust in knowledge sharing in routine operations within organizations. Based
on a detailed literature review, they proposed a model consisting of several variables and
linkages to show the multi-roles of trust in knowledge sharing, both as an antecedent along
with organizational culture, social processes, etc., and as a consequence of knowledge
sharing. The authors say that further study of the role of trust in knowledge sharing is to be
carried out and that the work will be valuable to the practitioners as it provides a basis
of understanding of issues in knowledge sharing and thereby knowledge transfer
in organizations.
Transition of most developing and developed nations to knowledge economies has
resulted in an increasing awareness of `knowledge' as a key lever for economic growth and
performance. In the paper, "Internalization and International Knowledge Diffusion: Empirical
Evidence from Spain", Pedro Mendi analyzes the factors that make the international transmission
of knowledge more efficient within multinational than between unaffiliated parties in
Spanish firms. The author developed and tested several hypotheses on transmission of tacit
knowledge internally, relationship with contract duration in the context of difference in transfer
costs between affiliated and unaffiliated transfers, the type of technology whether a product or
a process, and the linkages between the source and host countries. The transfer of
know-how has been showed to be associated with longer contract duration, only if the transfer
is unaffiliated. It is also reported that linkages between the source and host countries
increase the advantage of multinationals by suggesting that investment in creating institutions
that provide better information on potential host markets may be beneficial in the diffusion
of tacit knowledge, and hence to extend the firm's competitive advantage across markets.
Since Information Technology (IT) industry is knowledge-prone with skilled
employees as assets, it uses the KM as a business strategy with main focus on technology and
human resource management. In the paper, "Knowledge Management: Emerging Practices in
IT Industry in NCR", Jyoti Batra carried out a survey
questionnaire among senior executives chosen randomly to study the impact of
using KM process, and of learning from KM
process with reference to organization. It was found that
if the organization is using the KM process, there will be increase in the individual's growth with relation to
organizational support, and learning from KM process implementation helps to generate the new practices and ideas
in problem solving, etc.
To study and analyze the KM practices in automobile industry, S K Chadha and
Deepa Kapoor, in their paper, "A Study on Knowledge Management Practices of Auto
Component Manufacturing Companies in Ludhiana City", selected and surveyed some auto
industries in the city of Ludhiana in India. Their research indicated that although the
companies acknowledge the benefits of KM, there still exist barriers in knowledge sharing. The
results highlighted two important factorstraining employees to share knowledge, and
evaluating employees on the value and use of knowledgewhich could lead to knowledge sharing.
In practice, their findings revealed that information was not openly shared and that
the manufacturers need to convert the implicit knowledge of the employees into
explicit knowledge for all organizational levels. The results supported that knowledge along
with skills possessed by the employees, is considered as one of the most critical elements
affecting the work performance of the company.
Creativity and innovation, combined together, means the process of creating and
applying new knowledge and acts as the cutting-edge of KM. In the paper, "Measuring Creative
Work: The European Experience", Edward Lorenz and Bengt-Åke Lundvall attempted to
measure the volume of creative work and link it to the national economic performance in
Europe. Their results indicate that innovation may be promoted by KM strategies offering
employees opportunities to implement their own ideas. The paper provides some preliminary
evidence for systemic links between the level of creative work activity at the establishment level
and the capacity of firms to introduce new products or services onto the market. The authors
found that important strides in increasing creativity at work can be made by making
appropriate changes in human resource management policies and in organizational practice. They
concluded that policy efforts to improve innovation performance need to take a closer look at the
effects of organizational practice on innovation.
In the paper, "Effective Factors in Technology Transfer in the Pharmaceutical
Industries of Iran: A Case Study", M Mahboudi and B R Ananthan inquired into the effective
factors that influence technology transfer in Iran's pharmaceutical industries. They used
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model to classify and weigh those factors under different
criteria. They performed a survey covering managers and company owners and reported
that organization factor is showing the highest significance in the success of technology
transfer of pharmaceutical companies of Iran. After analyzing different factors, the authors
finally came out with a combined model of technology transfer based on structure, behavior
and technology as the most appropriate model when compared with various individual
models.
-- Nasina Jigeesh
Consulting Editor