IUP Publications Online
 
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
Effective Executive Magazine:
The Decentralization Continuum : New Organizational Designs for the 21st Century
 
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Technology is making easier for people to connect with one another. This change will push organizations further down a continuum of decentralization. Organizations will experiment with new forms of design. These designs will take the form of federal organizations, lattices and even starfish. This article outlines those decentralized designs as well as provides examples to better understand the changing nature of organizational designs.

 
 
 

It was Charles Handy (1989) who stood at the threshold of the new century and made predictions about how the changing world would change organizations. Handy's ideas were decades ahead of their time; they were also decades ago. Today, a myriad of new trends are converging at the outset of the 21st century that will affect how business is done. Technology is forcing companies and leaders to be more open and collaborative (Li & Bernoff, 2008; Li, 2008). A new generation, the millennials, are entering the workforce with new attitudes and aspirations (Alsop, 2008). Even the very nature of work is changing, from left-minded processing and operations, to right-brained creative and design work (Pink, 2006). These trends are combining to form a perfect storm that is redefining business as usual. From structure to strategy and even to incentive compensation, many organizations are changing their designs in order to remain competitive in this new environment. Of these changes, three designs in particular are thriving: federal, lattice and starfish organizations.

The concept of a federal organization was first identified by Charles Handy (1989), in which subsidiary organizations join together in order to gain the benefits of scale. In a federal organization, coordination and vision come from the leadership but initiatives are made by the component subsidiary organizations. Federal organizations are one solution that companies are using to deal with the dilemma of power and control. According to Handy, the federal organization structure provides a framework that enables autonomy and releases corporate energy for people to do things in their own way, so long as it is in the common interest. While federal organizations are easily recognized in government, from the United States to the European Union, many companies are beginning to experiment with federalization as well. Dutch-Anglo multinational, Unilever is one of the more famous federal organizations. It benefits from the sheer scale of its organization, despite its various subsidiary companies and products as diverse as Dove soap and Hellman's mayonnaise.

 
 
 

Effective Executive Magazine, Decentralization Continuum, Organizational Designs, Starfish Organizations, Federal Organization, Traditional Hierarchy, Decision Making Process, Traditional Company, Lattice Structures, Formal Assignments.