Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Amicus Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
Effective Executive Magazine:
Gene Revolution in a Gullible India : Serving the Wrong Interests
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Gene Revolution is affecting the Indian agriculture in a wrong way. The article discusses how the farmers are being made to buy overpriced seeds and how genetically modified foods are entering the country without proper regulation.

 
 
 

Dr. MS Swaminathan, Chairman of the National Commission on Farmers, who is at the forefront of the "gene" revolution, during an NGO meet in Sri Lanka, made a fervent call not to say "green" any more, but "gene" hereafter, asking us to put under the lid, the socalled "green revolution", which in any case is fast fading out, and instead, usher the "gene revolution". Ironically, it was he who, along with late C Subramaniam, pushed the idea of the green revolution vigorously in the 1960s, which is now mired under a cloud of environmental controversies, with fertile land turning barren due to the chemical onslaught, drying aquifers and vanishing biodiversity, etc. It might be, in the fitness of things, to critically examine some very recent developments on this score, which are a cause for great concern, when viewed in the background of India's national interests. First, it was the memorandum of understanding signed by the Chief of Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the State Department, USA, following the visit of Mr. Manmohan Singh to Washington, of the "Knowledge Initiative". According to this, ICAR scientists would be sent to USA for "capacity building" and a "tuition fee" will need to be paid to the concerned research/academic institutions to which our scientists will be sent. The major thrust of the knowledge initiative is to accelerate the "rapid commercialization" of Indian agriculture.

An amount of Rs. 400 cr will be the Indian outlay for the project. Interestingly, during the deliberations, representatives of both WalMart (the giant US retail trader in food) and Monsanto (the agribusiness giant) were present. One wonders whether the knowledge initiative implies a tacit admission on the part of the ICAR that it is scientifically incapable of independently delivering to the nation what the US promises to deliver. If yes, then why is the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, investing colossal sums of money in the research efforts of biotechnology at ICAR, which is the prime focus of the IndoUS MoU? To stretch the matter further, would India be unwittingly risking the future of its entire biowealth by opening up its research institutions for foreign "collaboration"? The neem and turmeric fiascos are fresh in our memory. And the clandestine biopiracy of the 1960s, aided and abetted by our own native collaborators, which led to the theft of our famed Basmati, which came to the world market as "Texmati"released by Rice Tec, a Texasbased agribusiness company is wellknown to the Indian public. It is also worth noting in this context the exorbitant (Rs. 1,650) price that Monsanto charged Indian cotton farmers for a 450 gram packet of their Bt cotton, while the native hybrid was sold at Rs. 350 for the same quantity, which the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission has ruled as totally unjust.

 
 
 

Gene Revolution, Gullible India, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, ICAR, Department of Biotechnology, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, Genetic Engineering Approval Committee, GEAC, European Union, EU, Food and Consumer Affairs, Green Revolution, Indian Agriculture, Refining Industries.