A typical supply chain consists of suppliers,
manufacturers, distributors, and retailers.
Each of them contributes to the performance of the chain and satisfaction of its
customers. Cooper and Ellram (1993) compare a supply chain with a well-balanced and
well-practiced relay team. In such a team, the coordination between the two players who directly pass
the baton is the strongest, but the entire team needs to make a coordinated effort to win
the race. Similar is the position of the distributors in a supply chain as they provide a direct
link between the chain and its customers. It is well established that the performance of
the distributors significantly influences the profitability and level of service of a supply chain.
Forrester (1961) has characterized supply chains by fluctuation, amplification and
lag in material flow, be it a raw material or a finished product. In a conventional supply
chain, the most downstream player receives customers' demand in the best possible form.
This distortion occurs primarily due to delay in communication and misinterpretation
of the information at various stages. The policies of a company and its decisions based
on this misinterpreted information further amplify the distortion in the information for
the next company on the upstream side. The obvious result of this amplification, known
as bullwhip effect, can be seen in the form of increasing variability towards the upstream
in the orders placed vis-à-vis the orders received. The ultimate effect of such
amplifications in the demand across the chain is the increased cost and reduced profitability.
Thus, the performance of a supply chain is affected by how good the
distributors perform and how much they contribute to the amplification of demand across the
supply chain. The present paper is based on the study of a few selected distributors dealing
in consumer electronics and belonging to two different supply chains. The purpose of
this research is to quantify and compare the bullwhip effect for the two distribution
echelons. The paper also analyzes the two systems with reference to various causes of bullwhip effect. |